BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID: University of Exeter
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20141203T150000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20141203T150000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY; CHARSET=UTF-8 :Prof. Malcolm Cowburn"Ethical issues in (qualitative) research with sex offenders"
UID:exeter_event_2300
URL:http://www.exeter.ac.uk/events/details/?event=2300
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20141203T150000
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20141203T170000
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
ORGANIZER: MAILTO:
ATTACH: http://www.exeter.ac.uk/events/details/?event=2300
DTSTAMP:20141117T101156
LOCATION:Amory B316
DESCRIPTION; CHARSET=UTF-8 :Abstract:

This paper reflects on some ethical and epistemological issues involved in conducting qualitative research with sex offenders that is respectful to all parties involved in the offence.  It considers three issues: 
•	Hegemonic knowledge and the shaping of research agendas.  Most research about sex offenders is conducted on/with convicted populations.  Most sex offenders only receive one conviction for sexual offences.  The number of sexual offences continues to increase.  The ethical difficulties in researching ‘unconvicted’ offenders restrict research in an area that may be most helpful in reducing sex crimes.
•	Dilemmas related to the development of new knowledge whilst not contributing harming others.  Central to this problem is the issue of confidentiality; traditionally criminological research has operated within a context of offering  total confidentiality to research participants.  In researching sexual and violent offences this is potentially problematic where participants may disclose unreported offences or the intention to harm others in the future. 
•	Constraints and possibilities of the qualitative interview – recognising and managing interpersonal/dialogical issues.  Two issues are considered here, and they both relate to the issue of ‘objectivity’ in interview practice.  The first area briefly considers the problem of ‘value’ dissonance where interviewers are required to listen to material that strongly conflicts with their own values.  The second area is the managing of distress in a qualitative interview.  Whilst principle based ethics can provide guidelines for conducting research they potentially restrict respectful dialogue between researcher and research participant. Character relationship based approaches (e.g. ‘virtue ethics’, ‘ethics of care’ and ‘post-modern ethics’) may offer greater scope for developing respectful research practice.
http://www.exeter.ac.uk/events/details/?event=2300
SEQUENCE:0
PRIORITY:5
CLASS:
STATUS:CONFIRMED
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-Microsoft-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:FREE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:0
X-Microsoft-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:FREE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR