BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID: University of Exeter
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20230207T113000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20230207T113000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY; CHARSET=UTF-8 :CCL - When does time stand still for the purpose of the Limitation Act 1980
UID:exeter_event_12715
URL:http://www.exeter.ac.uk/events/details/?event=12715
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20230207T113000
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20230207T123000
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
ORGANIZER: MAILTO:o.jones@exeter.ac.uk
ATTACH: http://www.exeter.ac.uk/events/details/?event=12715
DTSTAMP:20230206T103958
LOCATION:Newman Green LT (E)
DESCRIPTION; CHARSET=UTF-8 :Dr Laurence Emmett KC

Section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 looks, at first glance, more than just a little dry: it is concerned with the extension of the limitation period in cases of “fraud, concealment or mistake”. And yet, having lain unconsidered for many years, section 32 has recently been the subject of a series of decisions by the Supreme Court (e.g. FII Group Litigation [2020] UKSC 47; [2022] AC 1) and the Court of Appeal (e.g. OT Computers Ltd v Infineon [2021] EWCA Civ 501; [2021] QB 1183 and Gemalto Holdings v Infineon [2022] EWCA Civ 782). What is going on? Do these cases matter?

This paper argues yes. At a detailed level, they pose questions about what a claim is and how a statute should be interpreted. At a high level, they tell us something about where civil justice stands and where it is heading; and they invite us to ask what it is for.
http://www.exeter.ac.uk/events/details/?event=12715
SEQUENCE:0
PRIORITY:5
CLASS:
STATUS:CONFIRMED
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-Microsoft-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:FREE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:0
X-Microsoft-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:FREE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR